Tags: 2nd reading 4 Week Response ambient informatics ambient intelligence apple t-shirts barbie burroughs Data POV presentation links delicious design intentions dispepsi emotions final project update Fogg internet of things iphone apps ipod lie detector lockton media midterm MIPs Netflix non-human persuasive technology POV Question 1 question2 Question 2 Reading 1 Reading 2 redesigning emotions sadness Sandra's Exposure Presentation sensor networks smart objects social persuasion Spimes technovelgy Technovelgy Group Assignment tv Week 3 Technovelgy Response week 4 non-human post week 4 reading response week 8 emotions
By Rodrigo de Benito Sanz (January 26, 2009) (Question 1)
I’m usually a very skeptical person. I don’t follow Amazon’s recommendations; I don’t buy much in eBay and I have never installed a facebook application.
However there’s one thing I’m almost always persuaded to do and that is getting more information about some fact I read in the news (of course, if the described situation worth it). I try to read the digital version of my favorite newspapers and I usually click on the same links: technology, culture, economy. I know I will end up somewhere else. Clicking has no price of any kind (apart from time) and I enjoy going from one page to other to get more specifics about what I’m reading. This is one of the unbeatable qualities of computers: inmediate access to tons of information.
In particular I’m very easy to convinced when the information is related to some historical character. Maybe there’s a little description of a situation or some excerpts of a biography, and that’s it. I’m already going from the news to wikipedia and from there to related links, and so on.
I guess I can’t help being curious!
January 26, 2009
You must be logged in to post a comment.